McAfee Inc. Global Report Reveals Security Concerns Hinder Adoption
of Web 2.0 and Social Networking in Business
Businesses Agree That Web 2.0 Technologies Drive Revenue, Yet More
Than 60 Percent of Organizations Suffered Losses Averaging $2 Million
Due to Security Issues
Brazil, Spain and India Lead in Use of Web 2.0 Technology for
Business Activity
SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--McAfee, Inc. (NYSE: MFE) today revealed that business leaders worldwide
see the value of Web 2.0 in supporting productivity and driving new
revenue - but remain deeply concerned about security threats associated
with deploying the technology. A survey of over 1,000 global business
decision-makers in 17 countries found that half of businesses were
concerned about the security of Web 2.0 applications such as social
media, micro blogging, collaborative platforms, web mail, and content
sharing tools. More than six out of ten organizations have already
suffered losses averaging $2 million, for a collective loss of more than
$1.1 billion in security related incidents last year. There was another
60 percent concerned about loss of reputation as a result of Web 2.0
misuse. Brazil, Spain and India led in adoption of Web 2.0 technology
for business, while adoption was lowest in Canada, Australia, the United
States and the United Kingdom.
?Web 2.0 and social networking technologies can be used effectively for
some business purposes?
The report, titled ?Web
2.0: A Complex Balancing Act ? The First Global Study on Web 2.0 Usage,
Risks and Best Practices? commissioned by McAfee and authored by
faculty affiliated with the Center
for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security
(CERIAS) at Purdue University, examines the drivers for Web 2.0 and
social networking use in business, and assesses their benefits and
risks. Overall, the research highlights that while organizations see the
potential value of Web 2.0 tools, decision makers continue to debate
whether or how to allow employee usage of the technology in the
workplace.
?Web 2.0 technologies are impacting all aspects of the way businesses
work,? said George Kurtz, chief technology officer for McAfee. ?As Web
2.0 technologies gain popularity, organizations are faced with a choice
? they can allow them to propagate unchecked, they can block them, or
they can embrace them and the benefits they provide while managing them
in a secure way.?
Key Report Findings:
-
Web 2.0 adoption rates vary across countries - Overall, Web 2.0
adoption rates are high, reaching 90 percent or above in Brazil, Spain
and India. Adoption is lowest in the United States, United Kingdom,
Australia and Canada.
-
New revenue streams are the highest driver of Web 2.0 adoption - Three
out of four organizations reported that expanded use of Web 2.0
technologies create new revenue streams while 40 percent said the
tools have boosted productivity and enhanced effective marketing
strategies.
-
Security is the leading concern ? Half of respondents named
security as their primary concern for Web 2.0. There was also a third
that identified fear of security issues as the main reason Web 2.0
applications are not used more widely in their business. Companies?
top four perceived threats from employee use of Web 2.0 are malicious
software (35 percent), viruses (15 percent), overexposure of
information (11 percent) and spyware (10 percent).
-
Reputation damage is the biggest business consequence ? Sixty
percent of companies reported that the most significant consequence
from inappropriate Web 2.0 and social media usage is loss of
reputation, brand, client or confidence. One third of respondents
reported unplanned investments related to ?work arounds? related to
social media in the workplace. Fourteen percent of organizations
reported litigation or legal threats caused by employees disclosing
confidential or sensitive information, with more than 60 percent of
those threats caused by social media disclosures.
-
Many businesses block Web 2.0 rather than put policies in place ? Worldwide,
13 percent of organizations block all Web 2.0 activity while 81
percent restrict the use of at least one Web 2.0 tool because they are
concerned about security. Yet almost one third of organizations
reported that they do not have any social media policy in place. A
quarter of organizations monitor how staff use social media and 66
percent have introduced social media policies, 71 percent of which use
technology to enforce them.
Executives and industry experts who contributed to the research agreed
that successful organizational use of Web 2.0 is a complex balancing
act. Enterprises must analyze business challenges and opportunities
while mitigating the risks and ensure staff training and robust
technologies are in place to avoid cyber attacks.
?Web 2.0 and social networking technologies can be used effectively for
some business purposes,? said Eugene H. Spafford, founder and Executive
Director of CERIAS. ?But to reap the benefits of Web 2.0, organizations
must be proactive about understanding and managing the corresponding
challenges. That involves putting the right policies in place, and
deploying the technology that can enforce those policies.?
In addition, McAfee will also be hosting a Webcast on October 6, 2010 at
2pm EDT, titled ?Bridging
the Web 2.0 Security Gap,? with Chenxi Wang, Forrester Research.
This Webcast will cover a recent Forrester Research Web 2.0 security
trends study commissioned by McAfee. It will help educate enterprise
users about protecting their business while successfully using Web 2.0
technologies.
The McAfee ?Web 2.0: A Complex Balancing Act ? The First Global Study
on Web 2.0 Usage, Risks and Best Practices? report is available for
download at: www.mcafee.com
About the report:
Web 2.0 is defined broadly as consumer social media applications such as
Facebook, Twitter and YouTube and specialized enterprise solutions.
CERIAS faculty conducted expert interviews and analyzed survey data from
international research firm Vanson Bourne. Vanson Bourne executed the
survey to more than 1,000 organizational decision-makers in 17 countries
worldwide. The result was an in-depth study of emerging policies and
practices in how organizations balance the risks and benefits of using
Web 2.0 technologies.
About Purdue University
Purdue University is one of the leading public research institutions in
the United States, with strengths in science, technology, engineering,
agriculture, and management. Internationally known, with outstanding
faculty, the campus includes programs such as the Cyber Center, the
Rosen Center for Advanced Computing, the Computing Research Institute,
the Global Policy Research Institute, and the new large-scale
interdisciplinary Discovery Park.
About CERIAS
The Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and
Security (CERIAS) is the world's largest multidisciplinary academic
center addressing the issues of information security, assurance, privacy
and cyber crime. CERIAS involves more than 80 faculty and 100 graduate
students from departments across eight of Purdue's colleges. An
internationally recognized center of excellence, CERIAS serves as an
unbiased resource of information and research in the public interest.
About McAfee, Inc.
McAfee, Inc., headquartered in Santa Clara, California, is the world?s
largest dedicated security technology company. McAfee delivers proactive
and proven solutions and services that help secure systems, networks,
and mobile devices around the world, allowing users to safely connect to
the Internet, browse and shop the Web more securely. Backed by
unrivalled McAfee Global Threat Intelligence, McAfee creates innovative
products that empower home users, businesses, the public sector and
service providers by enabling them to prove compliance with regulations,
protect data, prevent disruptions, identify vulnerabilities, and
continuously monitor and improve their security. McAfee secures your
digital world. http://www.mcafee.com
NOTE: McAfee is a registered trademark or trademark of McAfee, Inc. or
its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. Other marks
may be claimed as the property of others. The information provided is
only for educational purposes and is subject to change without notice;
it is provided ?AS IS? without guarantee or warranty as to the accuracy
or applicability of the information to any specific situation or
circumstance.